The Australian Attorney-General's Department has pushed back at industry and privacy advocate concerns over mandatory data-retention legislation, stating that the leaks on the US National Security Agency's (NSA) surveillance operations by whistleblower Edward Snowden have hastened the need for the regime.
Under legislation currently before the parliament, Australian telecommunications companies would be required to retain an as-yet-undefined set of customer data for two years, not limited to but including call records, address information, email addresses, and assigned IP addresses.
The legislation is being backed up by Australian law-enforcement agencies, which claim that access to the data without a warrant is vital to almost every criminal investigation. Telecommunications companies and privacy advocates, however, warn that the scheme would be a major intrusion on the lives of every Australian, and that the costs of running the scheme will lead to higher prices for internet and phone services.
Telcos have suggested that existing preservation notices, which agencies can send to carriers, to retain the data for a specific individual under investigation would be much more appropriate than a wide-ranging mandatory data-retention regime.
The Attorney-General's Department, however, claims in its submission to the parliamentary committee investigating the legislation that there are "no practical alternatives" to a legislated mandatory data-retention regime.
keyboard shortcuts: V vote up article J next comment K previous comment