Visit Red Wolf's column >>

RED WOLFHome Page

and the werewolves came... and they ate him... and they drank his beer...
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 32; Links Seeded: 18428
Member Since: 1/2006Last Seen: 11/28/2009

Cadbury rejects Kraft's hostile bid

Read ArticleArticle Source: Guardian Unlimited
advertisement

Cadbury today rejected a hostile takeover bid from Kraft as "derisory" and not "remotely close" to its true value after the world's second largest food conglomerate took its bid directly to shareholders.

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
1.5
{"commentId":10585113,"authorDomain":"redwolf"}

The hostile bid was confirmed in a stock market announcement with offer terms unchanged from those suggested by Kraft in early September. The Cadbury chairman, Roger Carr, repsonded: "The board has emphatically rejected this derisory offer and has strengthened its resolve to ensure the true value of Cadbury is fully understood by all."

Carr has maintained the largely share-based proposal is "unappealing" and has refused to enter into discussions.

Movements in Kraft's share price and a weakening pound meant the formalised offer was worth £9.8bn, or 717p a share, this , down from £10.2bn, or 745p a share, when it was first mooted.

"The repetition of a proposal which is now of less value and lower than the current Cadbury share price does not make it any more attractive," Carr said. "[It] does not come remotely close to reflecting the true value of our company, and involves the unattractive prospect of the absorption of Cadbury into a low-growth conglomerate business model."

{"commentId":10585113,"threadId":"720537","contentId":"3481942","authorDomain":"redwolf"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Mon Nov 9, 2009 8:31 PM EST
{"canLink":false,"threadId":"720537","isPrivate":false}
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
{"threadId":"720537","contentId":"3481942"}
Start TrackingStart Tracking
Stop TrackingStop Tracking